<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slashing By Necessity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancing in a Recession: Can you Slash Your Way Out of It? &#171; RealDelia</title>
		<link>http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancing in a Recession: Can you Slash Your Way Out of It? &#171; RealDelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>[...] (see her book One Person, Multiple Careers for the full story). But Alboher has also written about slashing by necessity &#8211; how to add in the requisite slashes to make it through lean times. For freelance writers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (see her book One Person, Multiple Careers for the full story). But Alboher has also written about slashing by necessity &#8211; how to add in the requisite slashes to make it through lean times. For freelance writers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nine Blogs to Watch in 2009: Part 1 - The First Four</title>
		<link>http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Nine Blogs to Watch in 2009: Part 1 - The First Four</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] late 2008. I like the New York Times, but this was a bad decision. Marci is an expert on building slash/careers - she wrote the book on it: One Person/Multiple Careers: A New Model for Work/Life Success. Her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] late 2008. I like the New York Times, but this was a bad decision. Marci is an expert on building slash/careers &#8211; she wrote the book on it: One Person/Multiple Careers: A New Model for Work/Life Success. Her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Future Changes in 2009 - Part 1: About the New Name</title>
		<link>http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Future Changes in 2009 - Part 1: About the New Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>[...] The 2008 US elections, presidential transition, and current economic conditions all spell significant and deep change. Government needs to become more transparent, businesses need to run more efficiently, and education needs to equip people with skills to cultivate what Marci Alboher calls slash careers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 2008 US elections, presidential transition, and current economic conditions all spell significant and deep change. Government needs to become more transparent, businesses need to run more efficiently, and education needs to equip people with skills to cultivate what Marci Alboher calls slash careers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MN Headhunter &#124; Paul DeBettignies</title>
		<link>http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>MN Headhunter &#124; Paul DeBettignies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Marci,

A few links for you ahead of tomorrow’s Labor Department release of November unemployment numbers.

Here is a link to the October summary showing the 6.5% number, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

If you scroll down you will find other tables of information including this one which shows why unemployed http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t08.htm.

And this one which shows what is likely the real under/unemployment rate as 11.8%, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marci,</p>
<p>A few links for you ahead of tomorrow’s Labor Department release of November unemployment numbers.</p>
<p>Here is a link to the October summary showing the 6.5% number, <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm</a></p>
<p>If you scroll down you will find other tables of information including this one which shows why unemployed <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t08.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t08.htm</a>.</p>
<p>And this one which shows what is likely the real under/unemployment rate as 11.8%, <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat</title>
		<link>http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heymarci.com/2008/12/03/slashing-by-necessity/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I really like the analogy to investing. People used to buy individual stocks, but now most people buy mutual funds. An instrument with hedging built in at the micro-level. This happened when markets got professionalized and only analysts with time to deeply research individual stocks could pick &#039;em with a better-than-random return rate. In the career skills investment game, NOBODY has the time to deeply research individual careers before investing, so it makes sense for everybody to buy a diversified bundle of skills. Unless you are a child prodigy who knows at age 5 that you will be a professional pianist.

With careers, I think the right way to play it out is to stretch out your education over a true lifetime continual learning model. Buying 4, 6 or 9 years (bachelor&#039;s/masters/PhD) worth of &#039;education&#039; at once in one field is like investing in a one stock. Students already do things to mitigate the stupidity of this -- stretching even the undergrad to 5-6 years, taking exploratory co-ops, declaring majors late, taking on multiple minors etc. But really, the entire education model needs to be revamped. Univs should offer a &quot;4 years timeshared over 10 years&quot; kinda plan, where you gradually segue from being a full-time student to a full-time worker, exploring and developing a whole portfolio of economically marketable skills through interleaved educational and work experiences. Years 1 and 2 would be full time study with summer work. Years 3 and 4 would have 6 mo study/work. Years 5-10 would be 3 mo education/9 mo work.

While I don&#039;t regret a minute of my 9 continuous full-time years in mechanical and aerospace engineering, I basically lucked out. My &#039;deep&#039; skill set of mathematical modeling of systems is among the most portable technical skillsets on the planet, one that allows me to productively add value to anything from archeology to zoology. Others doing less portable things are not so lucky and have to retrain themselves to amateurish levels in domains where their paid-up-for skills don&#039;t port, and then feel underpaid/overqualified. The classic case being the English PhD flipping burgers.

Today, I spend most of my time thinking about the future of publishing and new models for print/media. Mechanical and aerospace engineering are distant nostalgic memories for me, and the most relevant education I got was actually a year I spent (&#039;invested&#039;) in an Internet media startup in 2000-2001. 

And yeah, I have a portfolio going too, even though #1 of my 3-4 income streams accounts for 95% of my total. You want balance as well as risk diversification too (&#039;bond&#039; gigs with lower returns, &#039;mature stock&#039; gigs with less predictable but higher returns, and shots in the dark that could make you millions).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the analogy to investing. People used to buy individual stocks, but now most people buy mutual funds. An instrument with hedging built in at the micro-level. This happened when markets got professionalized and only analysts with time to deeply research individual stocks could pick &#8216;em with a better-than-random return rate. In the career skills investment game, NOBODY has the time to deeply research individual careers before investing, so it makes sense for everybody to buy a diversified bundle of skills. Unless you are a child prodigy who knows at age 5 that you will be a professional pianist.</p>
<p>With careers, I think the right way to play it out is to stretch out your education over a true lifetime continual learning model. Buying 4, 6 or 9 years (bachelor&#8217;s/masters/PhD) worth of &#8216;education&#8217; at once in one field is like investing in a one stock. Students already do things to mitigate the stupidity of this &#8212; stretching even the undergrad to 5-6 years, taking exploratory co-ops, declaring majors late, taking on multiple minors etc. But really, the entire education model needs to be revamped. Univs should offer a &#8220;4 years timeshared over 10 years&#8221; kinda plan, where you gradually segue from being a full-time student to a full-time worker, exploring and developing a whole portfolio of economically marketable skills through interleaved educational and work experiences. Years 1 and 2 would be full time study with summer work. Years 3 and 4 would have 6 mo study/work. Years 5-10 would be 3 mo education/9 mo work.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t regret a minute of my 9 continuous full-time years in mechanical and aerospace engineering, I basically lucked out. My &#8216;deep&#8217; skill set of mathematical modeling of systems is among the most portable technical skillsets on the planet, one that allows me to productively add value to anything from archeology to zoology. Others doing less portable things are not so lucky and have to retrain themselves to amateurish levels in domains where their paid-up-for skills don&#8217;t port, and then feel underpaid/overqualified. The classic case being the English PhD flipping burgers.</p>
<p>Today, I spend most of my time thinking about the future of publishing and new models for print/media. Mechanical and aerospace engineering are distant nostalgic memories for me, and the most relevant education I got was actually a year I spent (&#8216;invested&#8217;) in an Internet media startup in 2000-2001. </p>
<p>And yeah, I have a portfolio going too, even though #1 of my 3-4 income streams accounts for 95% of my total. You want balance as well as risk diversification too (&#8216;bond&#8217; gigs with lower returns, &#8216;mature stock&#8217; gigs with less predictable but higher returns, and shots in the dark that could make you millions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

